Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

SPEECE v. DEL VECCHIO, 104 N.J.L. 666 (1928)

WILBUR D. SPEECE, RESPONDENT, v. J. ANTHONY DEL VECCHIO, APPELLANT., 141 A. 921 (Ct. Err. & App. 1928)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1928-05-14
Topic: general

SPEECE v. DEL VECCHIO, 104 N.J.L. 666 (1928) 141 A. 921 WILBUR D. SPEECE, RESPONDENT, v. J. ANTHONY DEL VECCHIO, APPELLANT.Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued February 14, 1928 — Decided May 14, 1928.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SPEECE v. DEL VECCHIO, 104 N.J.L. 666 (1928). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SPEECE v. DEL VECCHIO,104 N.J.L. 666(1928)

141 A. 921

WILBUR D. SPEECE, RESPONDENT, v. J. ANTHONY DEL VECCHIO, APPELLANT.

Court of Errors and Appeals.

Argued February 14, 1928 —

Decided May 14, 1928.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whoseper curiamis printed in5 N.J. Mis. R. 983.

For the respondent,Carlton GodfreyandWilliam I.Garrison.

For the appellant,William Elmer Brown, Jr.Page 667

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.For affirmance— THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.For reversal— None.