Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Chorpenning v. Yellow Cab Co. of Camden

Chorpenning v. Yellow Cab Co. of Camden, 115 N.J. Eq. 170 (N.J. 1934)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1934-01-05
Topic
general

Pee Cueiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Davis, and reported in 113 N. J. Eq. 389. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Pakkee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heheb, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Chorpenning v. Yellow Cab Co. of Camden. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Davis, and reported in 113 N. J. Eq. 389.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Pakkee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heheb, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.