Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

HAGEL v. SABINE, 38 N.J. 302 (1962)

DOROTHY HAGEL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. JOHN SABINE, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, PETITIONERS, & SUBURBAN PAVING CONTRACTING CO.,INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER., 184 A.2d 418 (N.J. 1962)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1962-02-12
Topic: general

HAGEL v. SABINE, 38 N.J. 302 (1962) 184 A.2d 418 DOROTHY HAGEL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. JOHN SABINE, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, PETITIONERS, AND SUBURBAN PAVING CONTRACTING CO.,INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER.Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 12, 1962. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HAGEL v. SABINE, 38 N.J. 302 (1962). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HAGEL v. SABINE,38 N.J. 302(1962)

184 A.2d 418

DOROTHY HAGEL,ET AL.,PLAINTIFFS, v. JOHN SABINE,ET AL.,

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, PETITIONERS, AND SUBURBAN PAVING CONTRACTING CO.,

INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

February 12, 1962.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Messrs. Seaman Clarkfor the petitioners.Messrs. Lamb, Langan Blakefor the cross-petitioners.Mr. Charles C. Stalterfor the respondent.

Denied.