Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWER. AUTH. v. BOR. OF MIDDLESEX, 79 N.J. Super. 24 (1963)

MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWERAGE Auth., A BODY Corp. & Pol. OF THESTATE OF N.J., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX, ETAL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS., 190 A.2d 205 (Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. 1963)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1963-04-16
Topic: general

MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWER. AUTH. v. BOR. OF MIDDLESEX, 79 N.J. Super. 24 (1963) 190 A.2d 205 MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THESTATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWER. AUTH. v. BOR. OF MIDDLESEX, 79 N.J. Super. 24 (1963). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWER. AUTH. v. BOR. OF MIDDLESEX,79 N.J. Super. 24(1963)

190 A.2d 205

MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THE

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX,ET

AL.,DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 8, 1963 —

Decided April 16, 1963.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.

Mr. Karl R. Meyertonsargued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Rafferty Blacher,attorneys for appellant Borough of Middlesex;Mr. Louis J. Milano,attorney for appellant Borough of South River;Mr. Elia Barbati, Jr.,attorney for appellants Borough of Bound Brook and Borough of SouthPage 25Bound Brook;Mr. John J. Rafferty,of counsel for all appellants).Mr. Edward J. Johnson, Jr.,argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Johnson Johnson,attorneys;Mr. Edward J. Johnson,of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Cohen in his opinion reported at74 N.J. Super. 591(LawDiv.1962).