Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mager v. United Hospitals of Newark
46 N.J. 398
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1966-03-07
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- dismissing claim that insurer failed “to furnish prompt and adequate medical care”
- this case can be distinguished on its facts, however, for the employee was injured as a result of improper medical attention in a hospital run by the employer’s insurance carrier
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mager v. United Hospitals of Newark. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 26 opinions
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Goldmann in the Appellate Division.
Hall, J., concurs in result.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall and Schettino — 6.
For reversal — None.