Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

FRANCOLINE v. KLATT, 221 Conn. 913 (1992)

ANTHONY J. FRANCOLINE v. LINDA KLATT, 603 A.2d 404 (Conn. 1992)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1992-02-14
Topic: general

FRANCOLINE v. KLATT, 221 Conn. 913 (1992) 603 A.2d 404 ANTHONY J. FRANCOLINE v. LINDA KLATT ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 203, is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's judgment that the defendant had not proven a valid claim under General Statutes 42-110a through42-110g, Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act?" Ann M.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FRANCOLINE v. KLATT, 221 Conn. 913 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FRANCOLINE v. KLATT,221 Conn. 913(1992)

603 A.2d 404

ANTHONY J. FRANCOLINEv.LINDA KLATT ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,26 Conn. App. 203, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's judgment that the defendant had not provenPage 914a valid claim under General Statutes42-110athrough42-110g, Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act?"

Ann M. Siczewicz, in support of the petition.

Robert J. Reeve, in opposition.

Decided February 14, 1992