Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
CAPOZZI v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 227 Conn. 925 (1993)
GEORGE M. CAPOZZI v. LIBERTY Mut. FIRE Ins. Co., 632 A.2d 702 (Conn. 1993)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1993-10-05
- Topic
- general
CAPOZZI v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 227 Conn. 925 (1993) 632 A.2d 702 GEORGE M. CAPOZZI v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY (14844)Supreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 250 (AC 11477), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Whether the Appellate Court correctly held that there was substantial evidence to support the arbitrators' conclusion that when the plaintiff was injured he was not operating a `replacement vehicle' and that he was therefore not covered by the uninsured motorist provisions of the two insurance policies issued by the defendant?" William I.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed CAPOZZI v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 227 Conn. 925 (1993). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
"Whether the Appellate Court correctly held that there was substantial evidence to support the arbitrators' conclusion that when the plaintiff was injured he was not operating a `replacement vehicle' and that he was therefore not covered by the uninsured motorist provisions of the two insurance policies issued by the defendant?"
James E. Kernan, in opposition.