Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

SCARSDALE NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST CO. v. SCHMITZ, 229 Conn. 923 (1994)

SCARSDALE Nat’l BANK & Tr. Co. v. ROBERT A. SCHMITZ, 642 A.2d 1215 (Conn. 1994)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1994-01-01
Topic: general

SCARSDALE NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST CO. v. SCHMITZ, 229 Conn. 923 (1994) 642 A.2d 1215 SCARSDALE NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. ROBERT A. SCHMITZ ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The petition of the defendants Robert A. Schmitz and Marion B.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SCARSDALE NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST CO. v. SCHMITZ, 229 Conn. 923 (1994). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SCARSDALE NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST CO. v. SCHMITZ,229 Conn. 923(1994)

642 A.2d 1215

SCARSDALE NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANYv.ROBERT A. SCHMITZ ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The petition of the defendants Robert A. Schmitz and Marion B. Schmitz for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,34 Conn. App. 905(AC 11990), is denied.

Robert A. Schmitz, pro se, and Marion B. Schmitz, pro se, in support of the petition.

Ellery E. Plotkin, in opposition.

Decided June 9, 1994

Page 924