Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

STATE v. SZYMKIEWICZ, 233 Conn. 903 (1995)

STATE OF Conn. v. DEBORA SZYMKIEWICZ, 657 A.2d 644 (Conn. 1995)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1995-04-24
Topic: general

STATE v. SZYMKIEWICZ, 233 Conn. 903 (1995) 657 A.2d 644 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DEBORA SZYMKIEWICZ (15253)Supreme Court of Connecticut The state of Connecticut's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 625 (AC 12807), is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 53a-181 (a)(1) does not include speech that constitutes `fighting words'?

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. SZYMKIEWICZ, 233 Conn. 903 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. SZYMKIEWICZ,233 Conn. 903(1995)

657 A.2d 644

STATE OF CONNECTICUTv.DEBORA SZYMKIEWICZ

(15253)

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The state of Connecticut's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,36 Conn. App. 625(AC 12807), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes §53a-181(a)(1) does not include speech that constitutes `fighting words'?Page 904

"2. If the answer to question 1. is no, was the evidence sufficient for conviction of a violation of that statute?"

Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.Scott M. Jones, deputy assistant public defender, in opposition.

Decided April 24, 1995