Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
STATE v. MIKOLINSKI, 252 Conn. 949 (2000)
STATE OF Conn. v. CHRISTIE MIKOLINSKI, 748 A.2d 298 (Conn. 2000)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2000-01-01
- Topic
- general
STATE v. MIKOLINSKI, 252 Conn. 949 (2000) 748 A.2d 298 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CHRISTIE MIKOLINSKISupreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 252 (AC 17866), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's detention at a roadside sobriety checkpoint did not violate her rights under either article first, § 7, or article first, § 9, of the Connecticut constitution?" SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition. The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16275.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. MIKOLINSKI, 252 Conn. 949 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's detention at a roadside sobriety checkpoint did not violate her rights under either article first, § 7, or articlefirst, §9, of the Connecticut constitution?"
SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16275.
Jeffrey D. Brownstein, in support of the petition.
Eileen McCarthy Geel, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.