Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Hedman
256 Conn. 909
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2001-04-25
- Topic
- litigation
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 403 (AC 19834), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the failure of the trial court affirmatively to offer the defendant an opportunity to address the court personally before the court imposed sentence in the dispositional phase of the defendant’s revocation hearing was plain error, requiring reversal of the imposition of the sentence?” ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Hedman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 403 (AC 19834), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the failure of the trial court affirmatively to offer the defendant an opportunity to address the court personally before the court imposed sentence in the dispositional phase of the defendant’s revocation hearing was plain error, requiring reversal of the imposition of the sentence?”
ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.