Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

HAYES v. DECKER, 259 Conn. 928 (2002)

GILBERT HAYES v. MARK J. DECKER, 793 A.2d 253 (Conn. 2002)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2002-02-26
Topic: general

HAYES v. DECKER, 259 Conn. 928 (2002) 793 A.2d 253 GILBERT HAYES v. MARK J. DECKERSupreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 293 (AC 20918), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff's expert's proffered testimony regarding the effect of discontinuation of blood pressure medication should have been admitted into evidence?" The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16692.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HAYES v. DECKER, 259 Conn. 928 (2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HAYES v. DECKER,259 Conn. 928(2002)

793 A.2d 253

GILBERT HAYESv. MARK J. DECKER

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,66 Conn. App. 293(AC 20918), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff's expert's proffered testimony regarding the effect of discontinuation of blood pressure medication should have been admitted into evidence?"Page 929

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16692.Lorinda S. Coon, in support of the petition.

Decided February 26, 2002