Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

STATE v. BAPTISTE, 260 Conn. 927 (2002)

STATE OF Conn. v. THEODORE BAPTISTE, 798 A.2d 971 (Conn. 2002)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2002-05-29
Topic
general

STATE v. BAPTISTE, 260 Conn. 927 (2002) 798 A.2d 971 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. THEODORE BAPTISTESupreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 68 Conn. App. 910 (AC 21798), is denied. Salvatore C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. BAPTISTE, 260 Conn. 927 (2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. BAPTISTE,260 Conn. 927(2002)
798 A.2d 971
STATE OF CONNECTICUTv. THEODORE BAPTISTE
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,68 Conn. App. 910(AC 21798), is denied.Page 928Salvatore C. Adamo, special public defender, in support of the petition.Robert M. Brennan, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Decided May 29, 2002