Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

MARTONE-ROSATO v. GUARDIANO-NEIZWANGER, 261 Conn. 926 (2002)

BEATRICE MARTONE-ROSATO v. PHYLLIS GUARDIANO-NEIZWANGER, 806 A.2d 1060 (Conn. 2002)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2002-09-12
Topic: general

MARTONE-ROSATO v. GUARDIANO-NEIZWANGER, 261 Conn. 926 (2002) 806 A.2d 1060 BEATRICE MARTONE-ROSATO v. PHYLLIS GUARDIANO-NEIZWANGER ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 70 Conn. App. 909 (AC 21799), is denied. VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MARTONE-ROSATO v. GUARDIANO-NEIZWANGER, 261 Conn. 926 (2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MARTONE-ROSATO v. GUARDIANO-NEIZWANGER,261 Conn. 926(2002)

806 A.2d 1060

BEATRICE MARTONE-ROSATO v. PHYLLIS GUARDIANO-NEIZWANGER ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,70 Conn. App. 909(AC 21799), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.Beatrice Martone-Rosato, pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided September 12, 2002