Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

CARUSILLO v. ASSOCIATED WOMEN'S HEALTH SPECIALISTS, 262 Conn. 920 (2002)

ALLISON CARUSILLO v. ASSOCIATED WOMEN'S HEALTH SPECIALISTS, P.C., 812 A.2d 861 (Conn. 2002)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2002-12-04
Topic: general

CARUSILLO v. ASSOCIATED WOMEN'S HEALTH SPECIALISTS, 262 Conn. 920 (2002) 812 A.2d 861 ALLISON CARUSILLO ET AL. v. ASSOCIATED WOMEN'S HEALTH SPECIALISTS, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 72 Conn. App. 75 (AC 21604), is granted. The case is remanded to the Appellate Court for consideration of the defendant's alternate grounds for affirmance.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CARUSILLO v. ASSOCIATED WOMEN'S HEALTH SPECIALISTS, 262 Conn. 920 (2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CARUSILLO v. ASSOCIATED WOMEN'S HEALTH SPECIALISTS,262 Conn. 920(2002)

812 A.2d 861

ALLISON CARUSILLO ET AL. v. ASSOCIATED WOMEN'S HEALTH SPECIALISTS, P.C.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,72 Conn. App. 75(AC 21604), is granted. The case is remanded to the Appellate Court for consideration of the defendant's alternate grounds for affirmance.

In view of our remand without further proceedings in this court, the provisions of Practice Book §84-9are waived.Lorinda S. Coon, in support of the petition.William F. GallagherandRoger B. Calistro, in opposition.

Decided December 4, 2002