Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Sengchanthong v. Comm’r of Motor Vehicles, 277 Conn. 911 (Conn. 2006)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2006-02-14
Topic: general

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 365 (AC 26105), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of the *912plaintiffs operation of a motor vehicle as required by General Statutes § 14-227b?” The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17606. Priscilla J. Green, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition. Steven A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 365 (AC 26105), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of the *912 plaintiffs operation of a motor vehicle as required by General Statutes § 14-227b?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17606. Priscilla J. Green, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition. Steven A. Torneo, in opposition. Decided February 14, 2006

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.