Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
STATE v. CLARK, 288 Conn. 916 (2008)
STATE OF Conn. v. MICHAEL K. CLARK., 954 A.2d 187 (Conn. 2008)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2008-07-29
- Topic
- general
STATE v. CLARK, 288 Conn. 916 (2008) 954 A.2d 187 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MICHAEL K. CLARK.Supreme Court of Connecticut The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 819 (AC 28371), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's ruling that the evidence seized from the defendant's vehicle and person should be suppressed as the fruit of an illegal seizure?" The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18186.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. CLARK, 288 Conn. 916 (2008). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's ruling that the evidence seized from the defendant'sPage 917vehicle and person should be suppressed as the fruit of an illegal seizure?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18186.Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.Annacarina Jacob, senior assistant public defender, in opposition.