Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
People v. Hampton
People v. Hampton, 300 A.D.2d 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2002)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 2002-12-30
- Topic
- international-arbitration
—Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), dated March 22, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Hampton. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 20 opinions
—Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), dated March 22, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.