Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

People v. Turner

61 A.D.2d 845

Type
Opinion
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1978-02-27
Topic
general

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 14, 1973, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, possession of weapons, etc., as a felony, and unauthorized use of a vehicle, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of unauthorized use of a vehicle, and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The defendant’s conviction under count four of the indictment, charging unauthorized use of a vehicle pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 165.05 of the Penal Law, is a lesser included offense of count one of the indictment, charging criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree pursuant to section 165.50 of the Penal Law. All elements required to prove the former offense were required to establish the greater offense (see CPL 1.20, subd 37; People v Chapman, 60 AD2d 584).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Turner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 14, 1973, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, possession of weapons, etc., as a felony, and unauthorized use of a vehicle, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of unauthorized use of a vehicle, and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The defendant’s conviction under count four of the indictment, charging unauthorized use of a vehicle pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 165.05 of the Penal Law, is a lesser included offense of count one of the indictment, charging criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree pursuant to section 165.50 of the Penal Law. All elements required to prove the former offense were required to establish the greater offense (see CPL 1.20, subd 37; People v Chapman, 60 AD2d 584). Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.