Opinion · Alabama Court of Appeals
Lisenby v. Lindsey
17 Ala. App. 467
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Alabama Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- Alabama
- Date
- 1920-06-08
- Topic
- litigation
BRICKEN, P. J. This suit originated in the justice of the peace court of precinct 6, of Henry county, and from a judgment for plaintiff in that court the defendant appealed to the circuit court. The cause was there tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was again rendered for plaintiff, and appellant appeals to this court, assigning as the only ground of error the rendition of the judgment by the court upon the facts in the case. It is a familiar rule in this state that the conclusion of a court sitting without a jury, if based upon the oral testimony of witnesses, must on appeal be given the force and effect of a verdict of a jury, and, unless plainly wrong, cannot be disturbed, notwithstanding the statute requires this court to review the conclusions and judgments of the trial court without any presumption in favor of the court below on the evidence.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lisenby v. Lindsey. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
This suit originated in the justice of the peace court of precinct 6, of Henry county, and from a judgment for plaintiff in that court the defendant appealed to the circuit court. The cause was there tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was again rendered for plaintiff, and appellant appeals to this court, assigning as the only ground of error the rendition of the judgment by the court upon the facts in the case.
It is a familiar rule in this state that the conclusion of a court sitting without a jury, if based upon the oral testimony of witnesses, must on appeal be given the force and effect of a verdict of a jury, and, unless plainly wrong, cannot be disturbed, notwithstanding the statute requires this court to review the conclusions and judgments of the trial court without any presumption in favor of the court below on the evidence.
We have examined the evidence in this ease, which is in sharp conflict. There was ample evidence upon which to base the judgment rendered. There is nothing in the record making it clearly apparent that the court was plainly wrong in its conclusions, and the judgment rendered in the court below is affirmed.
Affirmed.