Opinion · Nylaw New York

MOFFITT v. LAPP INSULATOR COMPANY, 286 App. Div. 1145 (1955)

FRED MOFFITT, Plaintiff, v. LAPP INSULATOR Co., Defendant andThird-Party Plaintiff-Appellant.KENNETH G. COWLES, Doing Bus. as EXECUTONE Sys. CO., Third-PartyDefendant-Respondent., 286 A.D. 1145 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department. 1955)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1955-11-16
Topic: general

MOFFITT v. LAPP INSULATOR COMPANY, 286 App. Div. 1145 (1955) FRED MOFFITT, Plaintiff, v. LAPP INSULATOR COMPANY, Defendant andThird-Party Plaintiff-Appellant.KENNETH G. COWLES, Doing Business as EXECUTONE SYSTEMS CO., Third-PartyDefendant-Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MOFFITT v. LAPP INSULATOR COMPANY, 286 App. Div. 1145 (1955). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MOFFITT v. LAPP INSULATOR COMPANY,286 App. Div. 1145(1955)

FRED MOFFITT, Plaintiff, v. LAPP INSULATOR COMPANY, Defendant and

Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant.

KENNETH G. COWLES, Doing Business as EXECUTONE SYSTEMS CO., Third-Party

Defendant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

November 16, 1955.

Appeal from Monroe Special Term.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.Page 1146