Opinion · Nylaw New York
BURKE v. HYGRADE COAL COMPANY, 223 App. Div. 849 (1928)
MARY BURKE, as Adm’r, Adm’x, etc., of THOMAS BURKE, Deceased, Respondent,v. HYGRADE COAL Co., Appellant., 223 A.D. 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1928)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1928-01-01
- Topic
- general
BURKE v. HYGRADE COAL COMPANY, 223 App. Div. 849 (1928) MARY BURKE, as Administratrix, etc., of THOMAS BURKE, Deceased, Respondent,v. HYGRADE COAL COMPANY, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. April, 1928.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed BURKE v. HYGRADE COAL COMPANY, 223 App. Div. 849 (1928). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
BURKE v. HYGRADE COAL COMPANY,223 App. Div. 849(1928)
MARY BURKE, as Administratrix, etc., of THOMAS BURKE, Deceased, Respondent,
v. HYGRADE COAL COMPANY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
April, 1928.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Scudder, JJ.