Opinion · Nylaw New York

BERGIN v. ANDERSON, 216 App. Div. 844 (1926)

ALBERT E. BERGIN, Appellant, v. JOHN R. ANDERSON, Respondent., 216 A.D. 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1926)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1926-01-01
Topic: general

BERGIN v. ANDERSON, 216 App. Div. 844 (1926) ALBERT E. BERGIN, Appellant, v. JOHN R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BERGIN v. ANDERSON, 216 App. Div. 844 (1926). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BERGIN v. ANDERSON,216 App. Div. 844(1926)

ALBERT E. BERGIN, Appellant, v. JOHN R. ANDERSON, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

May, 1926.

Upon reargument, order, in so far as it denies a motion to resettle an order so as to recite all papers used upon the original motion, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Such an order is appealable. (American Audit Co.v.Industrial Federation,87 App. Div. 275;Farmers' NationalBankv.Underwood, 12 id. 269;Deutermannv.Pollock, 36 id. 522;Tuskav.Jarvis,61 Misc. 224.) Decisions holding that an order denying a motion for resettlement is not appealable relate to motions made to modify or change the relief granted by the original order. (Placev.Hayward,100 N.Y. 626;WestSide National Bankv.Warsaw Discount Bank,204 App. Div. 4;Pinchotv.New York Elevated R.R. Co., 49 id. 356;WalthamManufacturing Co.v.Brady, 67 id. 102.) Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.