Opinion · Nylaw New York

BECK v. BROAD CHANNEL BATHING PARK, INC., 231 App. Div. 734 (1930)

ALICE A. BECK & WILLIAM O. BECK, Appellants, v. BROAD CHANNEL BATHINGPARK, INC., Respondent.[fn*], 231 A.D. 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1930)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1930-01-01
Topic
general

BECK v. BROAD CHANNEL BATHING PARK, INC., 231 App. Div. 734 (1930) ALICE A. BECK and WILLIAM O. BECK, Appellants, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BECK v. BROAD CHANNEL BATHING PARK, INC., 231 App. Div. 734 (1930). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BECK v. BROAD CHANNEL BATHING PARK, INC.,231 App. Div. 734(1930)
ALICE A. BECK and WILLIAM O. BECK, Appellants, v. BROAD CHANNEL BATHING
PARK, INC., Respondent.fn*
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
November, 1930.
Judgment dismissing complaint affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., and Hagarty, J., dissent, being of opinion that there was a question of fact for determination by the jury because of the location of the post in proximity to the ladder.
  1. Affd.,255 N.Y. 641. ↩