Opinion · Nylaw New York

BACHE v. MARKO, 248 App. Div. 810 (1936)

JULES S. BACHE & Others, Copartners Doing Bus. as J.S. BACHE ANDCOMPANY, Appellants, v. JOHN H. MARKO, Respondent., 248 A.D. 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department. 1936)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1936-01-01
Topic: general

BACHE v. MARKO, 248 App. Div. 810 (1936) JULES S. BACHE and Others, Copartners Doing Business as J.S. BACHE ANDCOMPANY, Appellants, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BACHE v. MARKO, 248 App. Div. 810 (1936). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BACHE v. MARKO,248 App. Div. 810(1936)

JULES S. BACHE and Others, Copartners Doing Business as J.S. BACHE AND

COMPANY, Appellants, v. JOHN H. MARKO, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

June, 1936.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant on a counterclaim in an action to recover on stock transactions. The order denies motion for a new trial on the minutes.)

Present — Sears, P.J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.