Opinion · Nylaw New York

LOYDAHL v. HAGLUND, 260 App. Div. 900 (1940)

HELMFRID LOYDAHL, Suing on Behalf of Himself & of Other S’holders ofLUNDELL-ECKBERG Mfg. CO., INC., Similarly Situated & on Behalf ofthe Corp., Respondent, v. ELMER HAGLUND, Appellant, D. LAWRENCECARLSON, Defendant, & VICTOR LUNDELL, Appellant, Constituting the Bd. ofDirectors & Sole Officers of the LUNDELL-ECKBERG Mfg. CO., INC.,and LUNDELL-ECKBERG Mfg. CO., INC., Defendant., 260 A.D. 900 (Appell

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1940-10-02
Topic
general

LOYDAHL v. HAGLUND, 260 App. Div. 900 (1940) HELMFRID LOYDAHL, Suing on Behalf of Himself and of Other Stockholders ofLUNDELL-ECKBERG MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Similarly Situated and on Behalf ofthe Corporation, Respondent, v. ELMER HAGLUND, Appellant, D. LAWRENCECARLSON, Defendant, and VICTOR LUNDELL, Appellant, Constituting the Board ofDirectors and Sole Officers of the LUNDELL-ECKBERG MANUFACTURING CO., INC.,and LUNDELL-ECKBERG MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Defendant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed LOYDAHL v. HAGLUND, 260 App. Div. 900 (1940). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

LOYDAHL v. HAGLUND,260 App. Div. 900(1940)
HELMFRID LOYDAHL, Suing on Behalf of Himself and of Other Stockholders of
LUNDELL-ECKBERG MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Similarly Situated and on Behalf of
the Corporation, Respondent, v. ELMER HAGLUND, Appellant, D. LAWRENCE
CARLSON, Defendant, and VICTOR LUNDELL, Appellant, Constituting the Board of
Directors and Sole Officers of the LUNDELL-ECKBERG MANUFACTURING CO., INC.,
and LUNDELL-ECKBERG MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
October 2, 1940.
Order so far as appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from denies a motion of defendants Lundell and Haglund to vacate a notice and subpoenaduces tecumfor their examination before trial in a stockholder's action.)
Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.Page 901