Opinion · Nylaw New York

QUALITY FRUIT WINES CORP. v. CRIBARI, 272 App. Div. 1070 (1947)

QUALITY FRUIT WINES CORP., Respondent, v. FIORE CRIBARI et al., Individuallyand as Copartners Doing Bus. under the Name of B. CRIBARI SONS,Appellants., 272 A.D. 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1947)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1947-11-17
Topic: general

QUALITY FRUIT WINES CORP. v. CRIBARI, 272 App. Div. 1070 (1947) QUALITY FRUIT WINES CORP., Respondent, v. FIORE CRIBARI et al., Individuallyand as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of B. CRIBARI SONS,Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed QUALITY FRUIT WINES CORP. v. CRIBARI, 272 App. Div. 1070 (1947). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

QUALITY FRUIT WINES CORP. v. CRIBARI,272 App. Div. 1070(1947)

QUALITY FRUIT WINES CORP., Respondent, v. FIORE CRIBARI et al., Individually

and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of B. CRIBARI SONS,

Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

November 17, 1947.

Order denying motion to vacate writ of attachment reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. The original papers upon which the warrant of attachment was issued fail to state evidentiary facts sufficient to prove nonresidence, and establish that the statement of residence therein contained was not made upon the knowledge of affiant. (Cousinsv.Schlichter,135 App. Div. 779. ) Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.