Opinion · Nylaw New York

KINNEY v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., 270 App. Div. 960 (1946)

SARAH v. KINNEY, Respondent, v. JOHN HANCOCK Mut. LIFE Ins. COMPANY,Appellant., 270 A.D. 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1946)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1946-05-08
Topic: general

KINNEY v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., 270 App. Div. 960 (1946) SARAH V. KINNEY, Respondent, v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KINNEY v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., 270 App. Div. 960 (1946). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KINNEY v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.,270 App. Div. 960(1946)

SARAH V. KINNEY, Respondent, v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

May 8, 1946.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Hill, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster and Lawrence, JJ., concur; Foster, J., taking no part. [Seeante, p. 864.]