Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

EASTMAN v. SMITHIES, 80 Conn. App. 901 (2003)

RAE A. EASTMAN v. RICHARD SMITHIES, 80 Conn. App. 901 (Conn. App. Ct. 2003)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2003-11-04
Topic
general

EASTMAN v. SMITHIES, 80 Conn. App. 901 (2003) RAE A. EASTMAN v. RICHARD SMITHIES ET AL.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed EASTMAN v. SMITHIES, 80 Conn. App. 901 (2003). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

EASTMAN v. SMITHIES,80 Conn. App. 901(2003)
RAE A. EASTMAN v. RICHARD SMITHIES ET AL.
(AC 23237).
Appellate Court of Connecticut.
Bishop, McLachlan and Hennessy, Js.
Argued September 9, 2003.
Officially released November 4, 2003.
Plaintiff's appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Litchfield,Trombley, J.
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed.