Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

Cato v. Cato

222 Conn. 906

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
1992-05-21
Topic
general

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 142, is granted, limited to the following question: “Was the divided Appellate Court correct in holding in a claim for dissolution that General Statutes § 52-57a allows for in-hand service of process by a Texas sheriff on a nonresident defendant in Texas without an order of notice having been obtained as provided for in the domestic relations long-arm statute, General Statutes § 46b-46?”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cato v. Cato. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 142, is granted, limited to the following question:

“Was the divided Appellate Court correct in holding in a claim for dissolution that General Statutes § 52-57a allows for in-hand service of process by a Texas sheriff on a nonresident defendant in Texas without an order of notice having been obtained as provided for in the domestic relations long-arm statute, General Statutes § 46b-46?”