Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Buster

State v. Buster, 222 Conn. 909 (Conn. 1992)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
1992-05-21
Topic
general

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 263, is granted, limited to the following questions: “1. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the trial court properly admitted into evidence certain remarks attributed to a nonparty witness contained in the written statement of another witness, pursuant to *910State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 514 A.2d 86, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994, 107 S. Ct. 597, 93 L.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Buster. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 263, is granted, limited to the following questions:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the trial court properly admitted into evidence certain remarks attributed to a nonparty witness contained in the written statement of another witness, pursuant to *910 State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 514 A.2d 86, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994, 107 S. Ct. 597, 93 L. Ed. 2d 598 (1986)?

Michael A. Fitzpatrick, special public defender, in support of the petition. Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided May 21, 1992

“2. If the ruling was erroneous, was it harmful?”