Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Faraday
State v. Faraday, 261 Conn. 915 (Conn. 2002)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2002-09-05
- Topic
- litigation
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 421 (AC 20667), is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 53a-32 was not applicable because it could not be applied retroactively to the defendant? “2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly determined that the conditions of probation had been violated?” *916The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16827. Michele C.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Faraday. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 421 (AC 20667), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 53a-32 was not applicable because it could not be applied retroactively to the defendant?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly determined that the conditions of probation had been violated?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.