Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Johnson

Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Johnson, 123 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1941)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1941-11-07
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. It appearing from consideration of the record, oral argument and briefs in this cause that the judgment of the District Court entered on the verdict of a jury was correct, for the reasons stated by the District Court in its opinion filed on motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial (33 F.Supp. 176), the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Johnson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
8 opinions
SCHLITZ BREWING CO. v. JOHNSON,123 F.2d 1016(6th Cir. 1941)
Jos. SCHLITZ BREWING CO., Appellant, v. E.A. JOHNSON and A.H. Gould, Doing
Business as Chattanooga Beer Distributors, Appellees.
No. 8733.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
November 7, 1941.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee; Leslie R. Darr, Judge.
Corrigan Backus and Francis H. Parson, all of Milwaukee, Wis., John A. Chambliss, of Chattanooga, Tenn., and Kenneth F. Webster, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellant.Page 1017

Phil B. Whitaker, W.C. Smith, and W.M. Haynes, all of Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellees.
Before HICKS, ALLEN, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
It appearing from consideration of the record, oral argument and briefs in this cause that the judgment of the District Court entered on the verdict of a jury was correct, for the reasons stated by the District Court in its opinion filed on motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial (33 F. Supp. 176), the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.