Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Commissioner v. Fry

283 F.2d 869

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1960-10-18
Topic: general

ORDER. The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised: Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the decision of the Tax Court be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Tietjens. 31 T.C. 522.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Commissioner v. Fry. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 6 opinions

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FRY,283 F.2d 869(6th Cir. 1960)

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. William N. FRY, Jr., and

Mable W. Fry, Respondents. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,

v. William Stokes WALTERS and Milly Fry Walters, Respondents.

Nos. 14095, 14096.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

October 18, 1960.

John J. Pajak, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and I. Henry Kutz, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner.

Charles H. Davis, Memphis, Tenn., Montedonico, Boone, Gilliland, Heiskell Loch, Memphis, Tenn., on brief, for respondents.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and CECIL and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the decision of the Tax Court be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Tietjens.31 T.C. 522.