Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. HAMMOND, 18 F.2d 1020 (2nd Cir. 1927)

Pa. R.R. Co., Plaintiff in Error, v. Edsall J. HAMMOND,Defendant in Error., 18 F.2d 1020 (2d Cir. 1927)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1927-04-04
Topic: general

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. HAMMOND, 18 F.2d 1020 (2nd Cir. 1927) PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edsall J. HAMMOND,Defendant in Error. No. 233.Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. HAMMOND, 18 F.2d 1020 (2nd Cir. 1927). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. HAMMOND,18 F.2d 1020(2nd Cir. 1927)

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edsall J. HAMMOND,

Defendant in Error.

No. 233.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 4, 1927.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.

Alexander S. Diven, of Elmira, N.Y., for plaintiff in error.

Mortimer L. Sullivan, of Elmira, N.Y., for defendant in error.

Before MANTON, HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment (15 F.[2d] 66) affirmed, with costs.