Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

AMARILLO OIL CO. v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 77 F.2d 991 (10th Cir. 1934)

AMARILLO OIL Co. v. Comm’r OF INTERNAL REVENUE., 77 F.2d 991 (10th Cir. 1934)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1934-12-31
Topic: general

AMARILLO OIL CO. v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 77 F.2d 991 (10th Cir. 1934) AMARILLO OIL COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 1204.Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed AMARILLO OIL CO. v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 77 F.2d 991 (10th Cir. 1934). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

AMARILLO OIL CO. v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE,77 F.2d 991(10th Cir. 1934)

AMARILLO OIL COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 1204.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

December 31, 1934.

Petition to Review the Decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

H.B. McCawley, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for review dismissed for failure to prosecute.Page 992