Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Brown v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California

Brown v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal., 8 F.2d 996 (5th Cir. 1925)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1925-11-25
Topic
general

FOSTER, Circuit Judge. This is a suit on a policy of accident insurance which provided for double indemnity if the bodily injury was sustained “while in or on a public conveyance (including the platform, steps, or running board thereof) provided by a common carrier for passenger service.” The insured was killed in an aeroplane accident, while a passenger in said plane. Suit was brought for double indemnity, claimed by virtue of the above-quoted clause. The defendant admitted liability for the face value of the policy and tendered that amount, which was declined by plaintiff. At the close of the case the District Court directed a verdict for plaintiff for the amount tendered, denying the claim for double indemnity.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brown v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions