Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Rasmussen v. Home Industry Iron Works
Rasmussen v. Home Indus. Iron Works, 117 C.C.A. 666 (5th Cir. 1912)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1912-11-27
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “To enforce the contract as claimed by appellant, without proof of actual damages, would be inequitable, permitting the appellant to enrich himself at the expense of appellee.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rasmussen v. Home Industry Iron Works. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
PER CURIAM:
On the facts we concur in the finding and decree of the District Court. 197 Fed. 661. To enforce the contract as claimed by appellant, without proof of actual damages, would be inequitable, permitting the appellant to enrich himself at the expense of the appellee. Decree affirmed.