Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

United States v. One Plymouth Sedan

135 F.2d 922

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1943-06-01
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Kalodner, D.C., 45 F.Supp. 461.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. One Plymouth Sedan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

UNITED STATES v. ONE PLYMOUTH SEDAN,135 F.2d 922(3rd Cir. 1943)

UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. ONE PLYMOUTH SEDAN, lately possessed by

Anthony Bruno Cassella. ASSOCIATES DISCOUNT CORPORATION, Intervening

Claimant.

No. 8069.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued May 20, 1943.

Decided June 1, 1943.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Harry E. Kalodner, Judge.

Joseph E. Gold, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Philadelphia, Pa., (Gerald A. Gleeson U.S. Atty., and Julian R. Eagle, Atty., Alcohol Tax Unit, both of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Hirsh W. Stalberg, of Philadelphia, Pa., (Albert G.F. Curran, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, GOODRICH, and WOODBURY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Kalodner, D.C.,45 F. Supp. 461.