Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

EGLESTON v. UNITED STATES, 168 F.2d 67 (7th Cir. 1948)

Mildred EGLESTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States andFlorence Hudson Egleston Stallard, Defendants-Appellees., 168 F.2d 67 (7th Cir. 1948)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1948-05-11
Topic
general

EGLESTON v. UNITED STATES, 168 F.2d 67 (7th Cir. 1948) Mildred EGLESTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America andFlorence Hudson Egleston Stallard, Defendants-Appellees. No. 9469.Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. May 11, 1948.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed EGLESTON v. UNITED STATES, 168 F.2d 67 (7th Cir. 1948). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

EGLESTON v. UNITED STATES,168 F.2d 67(7th Cir. 1948)
Mildred EGLESTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America and
Florence Hudson Egleston Stallard, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 9469.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
May 11, 1948.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Illinois; Walter C. Lindley, Judge.

Action by Mildred Egleston against the United States of America and Florence Hudson Egleston Stallard to recover on national service life policies, wherein last-named defendant filed a cross-claim. From a judgment for cross-claimant,71 F. Supp. 114, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.
Thomas A. Graham and Benjamin I. Norwood, Jr. both of Danville, Ill., and R.E. Boley, of Olney, Ill., for appellant.

Robert Z. Hickman, of Danville, Ill., Howard L. Brockman, of Olney, Ill., Wm. W. Hart, U.S. Atty., and Ernest R. McHale, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of East St. Louis, Ill., Calvert Brockman, of Olney, Ill., and Bookwalter, Carter Gunn, of Danville, Ill., for appellee Stallard.
Before SPARKS, MAJOR, and KERNER, Circuit Judges.
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff is the mother of Robert Carl Egleston, a deceased soldier of the United States, who was killed while in training on March 25, 1943. She brought this action to recover $10,000 insurance on two policies issued by the United States Government, naming it and Florence Hudson Egleston Stallard, the soldier's widow, as defendants. The widow has filed a cross-claim to recover the amount due on the policies, and the Government by way of answer avers that it is merely a stakeholder for the party entitled to it under the law.

The District Court found the facts fully, and rendered its conclusions of law in favor of the widow of the soldier, as set forth in its written opinion.71 F. Supp. 114. Judgment was rendered accordingly and from it this appeal is prosecuted.

The opinion of the District Court fully covers the issues here presented, and with it we are in accord.

Judgment affirmed.Page 175