Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

HEARST PUBLICATIONS v. UNITED STATES, 168 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1948)

HEARST PUBLICATIONS, Inc., a Corp., Appellant, v. UNITEDSTATES of Am., Appellee. Chron. Publ’g Co., a Corporation,Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of Am., Appellee., 168 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1948)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1948-06-23
Topic: general

HEARST PUBLICATIONS v. UNITED STATES, 168 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1948) HEARST PUBLICATIONS, Incorporated, a Corporation, Appellant, v. UNITEDSTATES of America, Appellee. CHRONICLE PUBLISHING COMPANY, a Corporation,Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HEARST PUBLICATIONS v. UNITED STATES, 168 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1948). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HEARST PUBLICATIONS v. UNITED STATES,168 F.2d 751(9th Cir. 1948)

HEARST PUBLICATIONS, Incorporated, a Corporation, Appellant, v. UNITED

STATES of America, Appellee. CHRONICLE PUBLISHING COMPANY, a Corporation,

Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Nos. 11781-11784.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 23, 1948.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, Southern Division; Louis E. Goodman, Judge.

Reginald H. Linforth and James I. Johnson, both of San Francisco, Cal. (Calkins, Hall, Linforth Conard, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellants.

Thereon Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, A.F. Prescott, and Arthur L. Jacobs, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Frank J. Hennessy, U.S. Atty., and William E. Licking, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Harry L. Price, of Oakland, Cal. (Robinson, Price Macdonald, of Oakland, Cal., of counsel), John J. Hamlyn, of Sacramento, Cal., and Harry L. Dunn, of Los Angeles, Cal. (O'Melveny Myers, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), L.B. Binford Binford, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), Reginald H. Linforth, of San Francisco, Cal. (Calkins, Hall, Linforth Conard, of San Franscisco, Cal., of counsel), Elystus L. Hayes, of San Francisco, Cal., and E.L. Skeel, of Seattle, Wash. (Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson Uhlmann, of Seattle, Wash., of counsel), Arthur E. Simon and Clarence R. Innis, both of Seattle, Wash. (Wright, Innis, Simon Todd, of Seattle, Wash., of counsel), W.W. Witherspoon, of Spokane, Wash. (Witherspoon, Witherspoon Kelley, of Spokane, Wash., of counsel), L.L. Thompson, of Tacoma, Wash. (Henderson, Carnahan Thompson, of Tacoma, Wash., of counsel), for Publishers, amicus curiae.

S.A. Ladar, of San Francisco, Cal., for Newspaper Periodical Vendors DistributorsPage 752Union and International Printing Pressmen Assistants Union of North America, amicus curiae.

Before GARRECT, MATHEWS, and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion (70 F. Supp. 666), the judgments of the District Court are affirmed.Page 793