Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
NEW YORK SUN v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 253 F.2d 487 (2nd Cir. 1958)
N.Y. SUN, Inc., Petitioner, v. Comm’r OF INTERNAL REVENUE,Respondent., 253 F.2d 487 (2d Cir. 1958)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1958-03-19
- Topic
- general
NEW YORK SUN v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 253 F.2d 487 (2nd Cir. 1958) The NEW YORK SUN, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,Respondent. No. 267, Docket 24755.United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.Argued March 5, 1958.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed NEW YORK SUN v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 253 F.2d 487 (2nd Cir. 1958). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
NEW YORK SUN v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE,253 F.2d 487(2nd Cir. 1958)
The NEW YORK SUN, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent.
No. 267, Docket 24755.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued March 5, 1958.
Decided March 19, 1958.
Morton K. Rothschild, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson and Harry Baum, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before LUMBARD, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.
This precise issue has been decided adversely to the taxpayer by the Tenth Circuit in Reporter Pub. Co. v. Commissioner, 1953,201 F.2d 743, certiorari denied, 1953,345 U.S. 993, 73 S.Ct. 1133, 97 L.Ed. 1401, and we affirm for the reasons therein stated.Page 488