Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Bobe v. Lloyd's

27 F.2d 347

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1928-06-18
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Order (27 F.[2d] 340) affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bobe v. Lloyd's. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

BOBE v. LLOYD'S,27 F.2d 347(2nd Cir. 1928)

Edith BOBE, Plaintiff in Error, v. LLOYD'S, a Corporation, Sued as

Treasurer of Lloyd's Underwriters' Syndicate No. 670 and Lloyd's

Underwriters' Syndicate No. 671, etc., Defendant in Error (Appearing

Specially).

No. 340.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 18, 1928.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

William Otis Badger, Jr., of New York City (Alfred L. Pitts, of Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Barry, Wainwright, Thacher Symmers, of New York City (Herbert Barry and James K. Symmers, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error Lloyd's.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order (27 F.[2d] 340) affirmed.