Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Bendix Aviation Corporation v. John P. Glass, Jr.

Bendix Aviation Corp. v. John P. Glass, Jr., 314 F.2d 944 (3d Cir. 1963)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1963-02-28
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. On November 7, 1961, pursuant to the District Court’s Opinion filed that day, judgment was entered dismissing appellant’s counter claim for failure to prosecute. On May 7, 1962, following re-argument, the District Court adhered to its original ruling of dismissal. On review of the record we can find no error. The Judgment of dismissal of November 7, 1961 will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in Senior Judge Kirkpatrick’s Opinions of November 7. 1961 and May 7, 1962, 32 F.R.D. 375.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bendix Aviation Corporation v. John P. Glass, Jr.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
6 opinions
BENDIX AVIATION CORPORATION v. GLASS,314 F.2d 944(3rd Cir. 1963)
BENDIX AVIATION CORPORATION v. John P. GLASS, Jr., Appellant.
No. 14100.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued February 8, 1963.
Decided February 28, 1963.
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, William H. Kirkpatrick, Judge.
Leonard L. Kalish, Philadelphia Pa., (Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien Frankel, Leonard J. Schwartz, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for defendant-counterclaimant, appellant.

Joseph W. Swain, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (C. Brewster Rhoads, Dexter N. Shaw, Wilson Oberdorfer, Howson Howson, Hugh G. Moulton, Montgomery, McCracken, Walker Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel, on the brief) for appellee.
Before KALODNER, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On November 7, 1961, pursuant to the District Court's Opinion filed that day, judgment was entered dismissing appellant's counter claim for failure to prosecute. On May 7, 1962, following re-argument, the District Court adhered to its original ruling of dismissal.

On review of the record we can find no error. The Judgment of dismissal of November 7, 1961 will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in Senior Judge Kirkpatrick's Opinions of November 7, 1961 and May 7, 1962, 32 F.R.D. 375.Page 945Page 318