Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
United States v. Sylvester Flowers and Charlie McClendon
331 F.2d 604
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1964-05-13
- Topic
- general
ORDER. The above cause coming on to be heard upon an appeal from a motion to correct the sentences imposed by the District Court upon appellants, and the Court being duly advised: Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order denying the motion to correct the sentences heretofore imposed be and is hereby affirmed, in accordance with the opinion of Judge Boyd, reported in 227 F.Supp. 1014 (W. D.Tenn.).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Sylvester Flowers and Charlie McClendon. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
UNITED STATES v. FLOWERS,331 F.2d 604(6th Cir. 1964)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sylvester FLOWERS and
Charlie McClendon, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 15678.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 13, 1964.
Thomas L. Robinson, U.S. Atty., Odell Horton, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Western District of Tenn., Memphis, Tenn., on the brief, for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon an appeal from a motion to correct the sentences imposed by the District Court upon appellants, and the Court being duly advised:
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order denying the motion to correct the sentences heretofore imposed be and is hereby affirmed, in accordance with the opinion of Judge Boyd, reported in227 F. Supp. 1014(W.D.Tenn.).Page 605