Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Billy Joe Winer

United States v. Billy Joe Winer, 519 F.2d 256 (8th Cir. 1975)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1975-07-14
Topic
finance

PER CURIAM. The defendant challenges his conviction under § 1202(a)(1) for receiving a firearm while a convicted felon. The facts show that on October 15, 1974, defendant, a convicted felon, borrowed a firearm from a friend allegedly to protect himself during a visit to a tavern in Little Rock, Arkansas. Within fifteen minutes of the time the defendant entered the tavern, the police arrested him > in possession of the gun. The defendant challenges the receiving charge under § 1202(a) on the theory that the government proved nothing more than temporary possession and such fleeting possession cannot be the basis for a receiving charge.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Billy Joe Winer. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
7 opinions
UNITED STATES v. WINER,519 F.2d 256(8th Cir. 1975)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. BILLY JOE WINER, APPELLANT.
No. 75-1210.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted June 12, 1975.
Decided July 14, 1975.
Page 257
Silas H. Brewer, Jr., Little Rock, Ark., for appellant, Billy Joe Winer.

Gene O'Daniel, Asst. U.S. Atty., Little Rock, Ark., for appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Before LAY, HEANEY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
[1] The defendant challenges his conviction under § 1202(a)(1) for receiving a firearm while a convicted felon. The facts show that on October 15, 1974, defendant, a convicted felon, borrowed a firearm from a friend allegedly to protect himself during a visit to a tavern in Little Rock, Arkansas. Within fifteen minutes of the time the defendant entered the tavern, the police arrested him in possession of the gun. The defendant challenges the receiving charge under § 1202(a) on the theory that the government proved nothing more than temporary possession and such fleeting possession cannot be the basis for a receiving charge. We disagree.

[2] As we have decided inUnited States v. Kelly,519 F.2d 251(8th Cir. 1975), the receiving provision of § 1202(a) encompasses mere acquisition by a felon since the statute was designed for the purpose of preventing felons from acquiring a gun. It is not synonymous with a possession charge since receiving requires more than mere proof of possession. Time of the receipt and venue must be proven as well.Cf. United States v. Overshon,494 F.2d 894(8th Cir.),cert. denied,419 U.S. 853,878,95 S.Ct. 96,142,42 L.Ed.2d 85,118(1974). The facts proven here are sufficient to sustain the conviction.

[3] Judgment affirmed.Page 263