Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Joseph E. Brodigan and Irving "Ash" Resnick v. W.H. McCormack

Joseph E. Brodigan & Irving "Ash" Resnick v. W.H. McCormack, 704 F.2d 1073 (9th Cir. 1983)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1983-04-25
Topic
litigation

The notice of appeal filed on April 6,1982 has no effect because there was pending at the time that it was filed a motion for a new trial and, in the alternative, to amend findings of fact and conclusions of law previously submitted to the trial court. No new notice of appeal was filed within the prescribed time measured from the date of the entry of the order disposing of the motion. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4). It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Griggs v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Joseph E. Brodigan and Irving "Ash" Resnick v. W.H. McCormack. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
BRODIGAN v. McCORMACK,704 F.2d 1073(9th Cir. 1983)
JOSEPH E. BRODIGAN AND IRVING "ASH" RESNICK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. W.H.
McCORMACK, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 82-5370.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 15, 1983.
Decided April 25, 1983.
Page 1074
David Goldwater, Las Vegas, Nev., for defendant-appellee.

J. Walter Park, IV, San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Before WRIGHT, CANBY and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.
[1] The notice of appeal filed on April 6, 1982 has no effect because there was pending at the time that it was filed a motion for a new trial and, in the alternative, to amend findings of fact and conclusions of law previously submitted to the trial court. No new notice of appeal was filed within the prescribed time measured from the date of the entry of the order disposing of the motion. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4). It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.Griggs v.Provident Consumer Discount Company,___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 400, 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982).

[2] DISMISSED.