Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.

Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co., 773 F.2d 1049 (9th Cir. 1985)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1985-10-08
Topic: general

ORDER Before GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and VUKASIN,* District Judge. The original opinion in this matter, which appears at 764 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir.1985), contains a typographical error on page 1342. The sentence immediately following headnote 23 on page 1342 should be changed to read as follows: “While a plaintiff cannot appeal a voluntary dismissal without prejudice, he or she may appeal a dismissal with prejudice.” The Honorable John P. Vukasin, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 27 opinions

COURSEN v. A.H. ROBINS CO., INC.,773 F.2d 1049(9th Cir. 1985)

SARAH COURSEN AND KATHERINE COOK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. A.H. ROBINS

COMPANY, INC., A VIRGINIA CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

PAMELA VAN DUYN, TERRI JOHNSON, JOANNA B. KUHNHENN, GAYLE McCANN, LAURIE JO

FRANZ, AND DEBBIE ROHL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC.,

A VIRGINIA CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Nos. 84-3853 to 84-3861.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 8, 1985.

[1] ORDER

Before GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and VUKASIN,^fn*District Judge.

[2] The original opinion in this matter, which appears at764 F.2d 1329(9th Cir. 1985), contains a typographical error on page 1342. The sentence immediately following headnote 23 on page 1342 should be changed to read as follows: "While a plaintiff cannot appeal a voluntary dismissal without prejudice, he or she may appeal a dismissal with prejudice."Page 1050

The Honorable John P. Vukasin, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. ↩