Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Houbigant v. Commissioner

80 F.2d 1012

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1936-01-17
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Decision affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Houbigant v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 2 opinions

HOUBIGANT v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,80 F.2d 1012(2nd Cir. 1936)

HOUBIGANT, Incorporated, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent.

No. 102.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 17, 1936.

Appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals.

Allen G. Gartner, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Louis Monarch and Maurice J. Mahoney, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Murray, Hollaman Lockwood, of New York City (R.D. Murray and Edward H. Lockwood, both of New York City, of counsel), for Doshi Trading Co., Limited, amicus curiæ.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decision affirmed.