Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Charlie Benson Bowen v. Ralph Kemp, Warden Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center

810 F.2d 1007

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1987-01-28
Topic
bankruptcy

ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION BY THE COURT: On the Court’s own motion, a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of rehearing this appeal en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the mandate issued on July 11, 1986, is RECALLED and that this case shall be heard by this court *1008 sitting en banc, with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion and the order entered on December 2, 1985, denying rehearing and rehearing en banc are VACATED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Charlie Benson Bowen v. Ralph Kemp, Warden Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
BOWEN v. KEMP,810 F.2d 1007(11th Cir. 1987)
CHARLIE BENSON BOWEN, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. RALPH KEMP, WARDEN GEORGIA
DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
No. 84-8327.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
January 28, 1987.
Susan V. Boleyn, William B. Hill, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellant.

Paul H. Kehir, Snellville, Ga. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellee.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Harold L. Murphy, Judge.
Before RONEY, Chief Judge, GODBOLD, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION
BY THE COURT:
[1] On the Court's own motion, a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of rehearing this appeal en banc,

[2] IT IS ORDERED that the mandate issued on July 11, 1986, is RECALLED and that this case shall be heard by this courtPage 1008sitting en banc,withoral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

[3] The previous panel's opinion and the order entered on December 2, 1985, denying rehearing and rehearing en banc are VACATED.